CRYPTOCURRENCY

Metamask: Error: ‘Invalid Sender’ when I signTransaction in bscTestnet – Web3

I can help you with this article. However, keep in mind that I will provide a general solution and that I will not cover all the on -board or specific use cases of the Metamask library.

** Error: “unlikely ammisse” when it is firmly firmly

The “non -valid” error generally occurs when the “Signtransaction” method is called with an unlikely sender. In the context of the Binance intelligent chain testnet (BSC), this error can be caused by certain reasons:

  • The incorrect sender : The SigntransAction method" awaits an Ethereum valid address such as its "sender". However, if you try to send funds from your private key to an external portfolio in BSC Testnet, you cannot work.

  • Unlikely ABI contract: if the ABI of the contract (binary application interface) is incorrect or incomplete, the 'signtransaction method can launch an error.

  • Make the web3

    Metamask: Error: 'Invalid Sender' when I signTransaction in bscTestnet - Web3

    supplier: Metamsk requires that a web 3 supplier is working properly. Make sure you have installed and configured the right web 3 supplier for your environment.

Sugged solution

Here is a step by step solution:

  • Check the ABI contract:

Make sure that the ABI of the contract is properly exported to the “contract” object in Metamask.

`Javascript

Const C = contract;

Const rewardScalcilatedtx = C.Methods.rewardScalculted (). Call ();

''

  • Check the management of the entity : review the Ethereum address which tries to send funds to:

Javascript

Const PrivateKey = "0xeeeeeeeeeeeeeexample";

// replaced with your real private key

Const Sandeddress = PrivateKey.tohex (); // Convert hexadecimal

If (Senceaddress! == RewardScalcilatedtx.sender) {

Console.error (Server Invalid: $ {Sendraddress}! = $ {RewardScalcultedtx.sender});

back;

}

''

  • Make sure the web3

    :

Make sure Metamask connected to the right web supplier for your environment. You can check it by looking at the "connection" section in the Metamask configuration.

  • Try a valid sender :

Try to sign the transaction using an Ethereum valid address, such as0xyourvalitydress ‘O’0xyourinvalidaddress’.

Here is an example of how you can change your code to manage these problems:

`Javascript

Const C = contract;

Const rewardScalcilatedtx = C.Methods.rewardScalculted (). Call ();

If (rewardscalcilatedtx.sender! == Privatekey.tohex ()) {

Console.error (Server Invalid: $ {rewardScalculcutedtx.sender}! = $ {Privatekey.tohex ()});

back;

}

// Check the ABI contract and the sender

Const AB = C.Abi;

Console.log (AB: $ {json.stringify (abi)});

// Obtain the address of the ABI contract

Constractaddress = abi [0]. Constant;

attempt {

// sign the transaction using the contract address and the private key

Const sigmedtx = rewardscalcilatedtx.sign (PrivateKey);

Console.log (Signed transaction: $ {sigmedtx});

} Capt (error) {

Console.error (error signature transaction: $ {error.message});

}

` ”

J’espère que cela aide à résoudre l’erreur “Sender non valide” lorsque MetAmsK est utilisé pour signer des transactions dans BSC TestNet. Si vous avez plus de questions ou de problèmes, n’hésitez pas à demander!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *